Randall Crook v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 1182

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Randall Crook

Applicant

-and-

Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc.

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Naomi Overend Date: July 8, 2013 Citation: 2013 HRTO 1182 Indexed as: Crook v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc.

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 45.9(3) of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), alleging a contravention of settlement.

2On May 22, 2013 the Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction (“CAD”) directing the applicant to advise the Tribunal and the respondent in writing if he wishes to pursue this Application within 10 days of the date of the CAD. The CAD warned that if the applicant failed to advise the Tribunal by the required deadline the Tribunal might consider the failure to respond as an abandonment of the Application and dismiss the Application for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the CAD and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.