Huzo v. Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council (OMVIC), 2013 HRTO 1169

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Roman Huzo

Applicant

-and-

Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council (OMVIC)

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Naomi Overend Date: July 4, 2013 Citation: 2013 HRTO 1169 Indexed as: Huzo v. Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council (OMVIC)

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on April 30, 2013.

2On May 14, 2013, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than June 13, 2013. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.