HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Emily Duke
Applicant
-and-
City of Toronto and Peter Konoplicky
Respondents
Interim Decision
Adjudicator: Ena Chadha
Indexed as: Duke v. Toronto (City)
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
Emily Duke, Applicant
Angela Chaisson, Counsel
City of Toronto and Peter Konoplicky, Respondents
Melany Franklin and Naomi Calla, Counsels
[1]
1On March 11, 2013, the Tribunal issued an Interim Decision, 2013 HRTO 413, wherein it determined that this Application should be deferred pending the conclusion of the criminal proceeding against the personal respondent.
2On May 29, 2013, the respondents filed a request to reactivate this Application on the basis that all charges have been withdrawn, thereby concluding the criminal proceeding against the personal respondent. The respondents provided a copy of court records indicating that all counts were withdrawn on May 2, 2013 at the request of the Crown.
3The applicant filed response submissions consenting to the request to reactivate.
4Given that the criminal proceeding is now concluded, the Tribunal determines that it is appropriate to reactivate this Application. Accordingly, the Application will continue in the Tribunal process.
5The Application is reactivated.
6I am not seized of this matter.
Dated at Toronto, this 14th day of June, 2013.
“Signed by”
Ena Chadha
Vice-chair