HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Donald Beacom
Applicant
-and-
Cassens Transport Ltd.
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Sherry Liang
Indexed as: Beacom v. Cassens Transport Ltd.
1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on January 13, 2012.
2On February 7, 2012 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than March 8, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.
3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.
4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.
5The Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 26^th^ day of March, 2012.
“Signed by”
Sherry Liang
Vice-chair