Robin Lacey v. Wilderness North and Guy Cannon, 2012 HRTO 610

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Robin Lacey

Applicant

-and-

Wilderness North and Guy Cannon

Respondents

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson

Date: March 23, 2012

Citation: 2012 HRTO 610

Indexed as: Lacey v. Wilderness North

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on November 25, 2011.

2On February 17, 2012, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than March 19, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.