HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Mark Daigneault
Applicant
-and-
Dr. Josephson, Dr. Aziz Engineer, Dr. David Saul, Dr. Edward English, Dr. Kovacs, Dr. Leslie Goldenberg, Dr. Colin Voorneveld, Dinah Hampson, Dr. Erwa, and Dr. Morton Brown
Respondents
DECISION
Adjudicator: Michelle Flaherty
Indexed as: Daigneault v. Dr. Josephson
1The applicant, Mark Daigneault, filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on August 15, 2011.
2On December 2, 2011, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than January 1, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.
3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.
4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.
5The Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 12^th^ day of March, 2012.
“signed by”
Michelle Flaherty
Vice-chair