Arunodayan Thirunavukkarasu v. MetCap Living, 2012 HRTO 2200

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

BETWEEN:

Arunodayan Thirunavukkarasu Applicant

-and-

MetCap Living Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson Date: November 23, 2012 Citation: 2012 HRTO 2200 Indexed as: Arunodayan Thirunavukkarasu v. MetCap Living

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on August 23, 2012.

2On September 14, 2012, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than October 14, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.