Tracy Lynn Carnohan v. Domclean Limited, 2012 HRTO 2004

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Tracy Lynn Carnohan

Applicant

-and-

Domclean Limited

Responden

DECISION

Adjudicator: Naomi Overend

Decision Date: October 24, 2012

Citation: 2012 HRTO 2004

Indexed as: Carnohan v. Domclean Limited

Introduction

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19 as amended (the “Code”), on February 29, 2012.

2On July 17, 2012 the Tribunal sent a Notice of Mediation to the parties scheduling the mediation for this Application on October 5, 2012. On July 30, 2012 the Tribunal received a letter from the respondent, copied to the applicant, requesting that the mediation be rescheduled due to a previous commitment on the scheduled day. The respondent provided alternative dates for the rescheduled mediation.

3August 1, 2012, the Tribunal sent an email to the parties directing that the applicant provide her availability for a rescheduled date from the dates provided by the respondent. The applicant did not respond to this request.

4On August 21, 2012 the Tribunal sent a letter to the applicant by regular mail and email asking that the applicant confirm her intentions with respect to the Application and respond to the Tribunal’s email of August 1, 2012. The applicant was informed that if she did not advise the HRTO of her intentions by August 31, 2012 the Application could be dismissed as abandoned.

5To date, the applicant has not responded to any of the Tribunal’s correspondence and the Tribunal’s correspondence to her has not been returned.

6In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

7The Application is dismissed.