Jeffery Cox v. Bell Technical Solutions, 2012 HRTO 1764

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Jeffery Cox

Applicant

-and-

Bell Technical Solutions

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson

Date: September 18, 2012

Citation: 2012 HRTO 1764

Indexed as: Cox v. Bell Technical Solutions

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on June 21, 2012.

2On July 17, 2012, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than August 16, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.