Cardona v. Precision Truck Lines Inc., 2012 HRTO 1727

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Diana Cardona Applicant

-and-

Precision Truck Lines Inc. Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Naomi Overend Decision Date: September 12, 2012 Citation: 2012 HRTO 1727 Indexed as: Cardona v. Precision Truck Lines Inc.

Introduction

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on July 3, 2012.

2On July 17, 2012, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than August 16, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.