Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
B E T W E E N:
Konrad Mauch Applicant
-and-
Loblaw Companies Limited (Wadland Pharmacy Limited) Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson Date: September 4, 2012 Citation: 2012 HRTO 1662 Indexed as: Mauch v. Loblaw Companies Limited
1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on June 14, 2012.
2On June 27, 2012, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than July 27, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.
3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.
4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.
5The Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 4th day of September, 2012.
“Signed by”
_______________________________
Brian Eyolfson Vice-chair