Felicia Johnson v. Ottawa Police Services, 2012 HRTO 1629

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

B E T W E E N:

Felicia Johnson Applicant

-and-

Ottawa Police Services Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson Date: August 27, 2012 Citation: 2012 HRTO 1629 Indexed as: Johnson v. Ottawa Police Services of Ottawa

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on May 23, 2012.

2On July 10, 2012 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than August 9, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.