Orlando Prescod v. National Steel Car Limited, 2011 HRTO 983

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

B E T W E E N:

Orlando Prescod

Applicant

-and-

National Steel Car Limited

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson

Date: May 25, 2011

Citation: 2011 HRTO 983

Indexed as: Prescod v. National Steel Car Limited

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on November 8, 2010.

2On April 6, 2011, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (NOID) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than May 6, 2011. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.