HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Deqa Duale
Applicant
-and-
Hertz Canada Ltd.
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Alan G. Smith
Indexed as: Duale v. Hertz Canada
1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended, (the “Code”), on May 12, 2010.
2The applicant was sent a Notice of Intent to Dismiss by the Registrar on October 20, 2010, which advised the applicant that it appeared the Application was outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction (power to decide) because the Application failed to identify any specific acts of discrimination within the meaning of the Code allegedly committed by the respondent.
3The correspondence of October 20, 2010, further advised the applicant that she must file submissions responding to the issues identified by the Registrar within thirty (30) days from October 20, 2010, or the Application would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or considered abandoned.
4The applicant has not responded to the Tribunal’s correspondence.
5In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.
6The Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 18th day of April, 2011.
“Signed by”
Alan G. Smith
Member