Claire Gunn v. Tim Hortons, 2011 HRTO 1536

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Claire Gunn

Applicant

-and-

Tim Hortons

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Alan G. Smith

Date: August 17, 2011

Citation: 2011 HRTO 1536

Indexed as: Gunn v. Tim Hortons

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on January 10, 2011.

2On June 23, 2011, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (NOID) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than July 23, 2011. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.