HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Gerard Ballack
Applicant
-and-
Federal Express
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Kathleen Martin
Indexed as: Ballack v. Federal Express
1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on March 1, 2011.
2On March 21, 2011, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than April 21, 2011. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.
3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.
4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.
5The Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 10^th^ day of June, 2011.
”signed by”
Kathleen Martin
Vice-chair