Murray Hall v. Superior Court of Justice - Stratford, Ontario, Paul Parlee and James Searle, 2011 HRTO 1115

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Murray Hall

Applicant

-and-

Superior Court of Justice - Stratford, Ontario, Paul Parlee and James Searle

Respondents

DECISION

Adjudicator: Kathleen Martin

Date: June 8, 2011

Citation: 2011 HRTO 1115

Indexed as: Hall v. Superior Court of Justice

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on March 22, 2011.

2On April 15, 2011, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than May 16, 2011. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed. The Tribunal’s correspondence with the applicant has not been returned.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.