HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Nikolaos Koutsokostas
Applicant
-and-
Convoy Supply (Canada) Ltd.
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Sherry Liang
Date: June 2, 2011
Citation: 2011 HRTO 1058
Indexed as: Koutsokostas v. Convoy Supply (Canada) Ltd.
1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on November 26, 2010, alleging discrimination in the area of employment on the grounds of place of origin, ethnic origin, family status, marital status, age, association with a person identified by a ground of discrimination, and reprisal.
2On November 5, 2010, I issued a Case Assessment Direction (“CAD”), directing the applicant to respond to the issues raised in the CAD within 30 days. The CAD advised the applicant that the failure to respond to the CAD might be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason. The applicant did not respond to the CAD and the time for doing so has now passed.
3In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.
4The Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 2nd day of June, 2011.
“Signed by”
Sherry Liang
Vice-chair