Karen Kelley-Alhwatat v. Johnson Controls Interior Manufacturing Canada ULC, 2010 HRTO 2321

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Karen Kelley-Alhwatat

Applicant

-and-

Johnson Controls Interior Manufacturing Canada ULC, Ativ Shah, Christl Hutahajan and Hirin Shah

Respondents

RECONSIDERATION DECISION

Adjudicator: Kathleen Martin

Date: November 22, 2010

Citation: 2010 HRTO 2321

Indexed as: Kelley-Alhwatat v. Johnson Controls Interior Manufacturing

1On November 15, 2010, I issued a Decision in which I found that the applicant had abandoned the Application and therefore the Application was dismissed. This Decision was based on information that the applicant had not responded to the Tribunal’s letter of October 6, 2010, seeking confirmation of her intentions regarding the Application. It is now apparent that the applicant did respond to the Tribunal’s letter confirming her interest in pursuing the Application but unfortunately the applicant’s email of October 18, 2010 was inadvertently not placed in the file.

2In the circumstances, I reconsider the Decision of November 15, 2010 and set aside the dismissal. The Application will continue to be processed. Unless the Tribunal hears otherwise, the parties will be contacted regarding the scheduling of an alternative date for mediation.

3I note that the applicant’s email of October 18, 2010 does not appear to have been copied to the respondents. If she has not done so already, the applicant is directed to send a copy of the email to the respondents immediately and reminded that under Rule 1.12, all written communications with the Tribunal, including email correspondence, must be addressed to the Registrar, with a copy delivered to all other parties.