HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Zeljko Seifert
Applicant
-and-
Rogers Cable Communications Inc. H. Speed Internet
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Ena Chadha
Indexed as: Seifert v. Rogers Cable Communications
1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended, (the “Code”), on February 18, 2010.
2On May 7, 2010, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application as outside of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction because the respondent appeared to be a federally regulated business. The Tribunal invited the applicant to provide written submissions within 30 days of May 7, 2010 addressing the issue of jurisdiction. No submissions were filed by that deadline.
3On June 30, 2010, the Tribunal emailed the applicant advising the applicant that if he did not communicate or correspond with the Tribunal by July 7, 2010, the Tribunal would deem the Application abandoned and close its file. The applicant has not responded to the Tribunal’s correspondence.
4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.
5The Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 4^th^ day of August, 2010.
“Signed by”
Ena Chadha
Vice-chair