HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Katheryn McLister
Applicant
-and-
Hart Hentschel Inc. o/a Auto House Honda
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Judith Keene
Date: May 20, 2010
Citation: 2010 HRTO 1133
Indexed as: McLister v. Hart Hentschel
1This is a Decision in respect of an Application filed on August 6, 2009 under section 34 of Part IV of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19 as amended, (the “Code”). A hearing was scheduled. On the morning of the hearing, the Applicant telephoned the Tribunal to advise that she could not attend.
2On April 21, 2010, the Tribunal wrote to the applicant, advising her that she must communicate with the Tribunal her wish either to proceed with the Application or to withdraw it, by May 5, 2010. The applicant was asked to provide an explanation for her failure to attend the previously scheduled hearing, and directed to the Tribunal’s Policy on Accessibility and Accommodation and Information Bulletin on Scheduling of Hearings and Mediation, Rescheduling Requests and requests for Adjournments. The letter advised that the Application might be dismissed as abandoned if the applicant did not respond.
3To date, the applicant has not responded.
4In the circumstances, the Tribunal deems the Application abandoned and it is accordingly dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 20th day of May, 2010.
“Signed By”
Judith Keene
Vice-chair