Krzewski v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2009 HRTO 1933

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Colleen Krzewski

Applicant

-and-

Toronto Catholic District School Board and Jane Cramer

Respondents

-and-

Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 1328

Intervenor

interim DECISION

Adjudicator: Kaye Joachim

Date: November 12, 2009

Citation: 2009 HRTO 1933

Indexed as: Krzewski v. Toronto Catholic District School Board

1This is an Application filed on June 26, 2009 under section 53(5) of Part VI of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19 as amended, (the "Code").

2The Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 1328 (the "Union") has filed a Request to Intervene. The applicant and the respondent did not file a Response to the Request to Intervene.

3The Union is the bargaining agent for a unit of employees employed by the corporate respondent and the applicant is a member of the union. The Union indicates that is interests may be affected by the issues and remedies.

4The Tribunal's Rule 11.1 provides:

11.1 The Tribunal may allow a person or organization to intervene in any case at any time on such terms as the Tribunal may determine. The Tribunal will determine the extent to which an intervenor will be permitted to participate in a proceeding.

5As stated by this Tribunal in Boyce v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2009 HRTO 131 at para. 13:

A union or association nearly always has an interest in a human rights application brought by an employee in a bargaining unit it represents when the application alleges discrimination in employment. Absent exceptional circumstances, the applicant's bargaining agent will be granted intervention status in Tribunal proceedings where it requests it.

6The Request to Intervene is granted. The extent of the union's participation in any future proceedings will be determined by the Vice-chair or Member who presides over those proceedings.

7I am not seized.