Bradfield v. Ontario (Lottery and Gaming Corporation), 2008 HRTO 115

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Bernadette Bradfield

Applicant

-and-

Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation o/a Brantford Charity Casino, Maria Graham, Mary Mare, and Patricia Kerr

Respondents

INTERIM DECISION

Adjudicator: Kaye Joachim

Date: September 30, 2008

Citation: 2008 HRTO 115

Indexed as: Bradfield v. Ontario (Lottery and Gaming Corporation)

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario 655 Bay Street, 14th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2A3 Phone (416) 314-8419 / Fax (416) 314-8743 / Toll free 1-866-598-0322 TTY (416) 314-2379 / (toll free) 1-800-424-1168 E-mail HRTO.Registrar-Transition@ontario.ca Website www.hrto.ca

1This is an application filed July 16, 008 under section 53(3) of Part VI of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”). The purpose of this interim decision is to address the respondents’ failure to attend the mediation.

2On July 17, 2008 the Tribunal scheduled a mediation for September 17, 2008. The mediation was subsequently rescheduled to September 24, 2008.

3The respondents failed to attend the mediation on September 24, 2008, allegedly through inadvertence. The applicant has advised that she no longer wishes to participate in mediation and requested that the application be scheduled for a case resolution conference.

4The Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure for Applications under Section 53(3) of the Human Rights Code (Section 53(3) Rules) and the Tribunal’s Guide to Section 53(3) Applications, contemplate that the first step in a section 53(3) application is a mediation. If mediation is unsuccessful, the mediator will assist the parties to complete a case management checklist (Rule 8) and the application proceeds to a case resolution conference, in accordance with Rule 9.1.

5Where a party refuses to attend the mediation, it may impede the efficient processing of the application, in which case the Tribunal may, in its discretion, issue a case management direction (Rule 5.14) directing that the parties attend at the Tribunal to complete the matters identified in the case management checklist. In this case, however, I am satisfied the application can be processed expeditiously without requiring such attendance.

6In the circumstances of this case, the Tribunal will proceed to the next step in the process, which is to prepare for a case resolution conference in accordance with Rule 9.

7Accordingly, the parties are directed as follows:

a. Within 30 days following the date of this decision, the applicant shall deliver to the respondents and file with the Tribunal, a statement of any additional facts the applicant intends to rely upon and a description of the remedies sought. In addition, the applicant shall deliver to the respondents a copy of all arguably relevant documents in the applicant’s possession, except where privilege is claimed.

b. Within 45 days following the date of this decision, the respondents shall deliver to the other parties and file with the Tribunal a statement of any additional facts the respondents will rely upon and the respondents’ position with respect to the requested remedies. In addition, the respondents must deliver to the applicant a copy of all arguably relevant documents in the respondent’s possession, except where privilege is claimed.

8The Tribunal will contact the parties to set a date for the case resolution conference. The parties are reminded that the Section 53(3) Rules contemplate that applications under section 53(3) of the Code be dealt with in an expedited manner.