The appellant appealed a trial judge's order for child and spousal support, arguing the judge erred in allowing a late amendment to claim spousal support, imputing too little income to the respondent, and creating undue hardship.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error.
The trial judge properly exercised discretion in allowing the amendment, had an evidentiary basis for the imputed income given the respondent's mental health issues, and the undue hardship argument was not raised at trial and could be addressed at an upcoming review.
