The plaintiffs sought leave to appeal a decision conditionally certifying a class action against a parking management company with significantly narrower parameters than proposed.
The plaintiffs challenged the motion judge's dismissal of causes of action under the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, unjust enrichment, and unconscionability, as well as the imposition of a limitation period and the exclusion of punitive damages as a common issue.
The Divisional Court found no good reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's order and no conflicting decisions warranting leave.
The motion for leave to appeal was dismissed in its entirety.