Following a motion concerning the passing of accounts and issues arising from competing powers of attorney over an incapable person's finances, the court addressed costs.
The underlying dispute was characterized as a personal sibling conflict that unnecessarily escalated into litigation regarding the management of the incapable person's property and personal care.
The court declined to award costs to either of the feuding siblings, finding that neither should benefit from litigation driven by personal animosity rather than the incapable person's best interests.
However, the incapable person, represented by counsel appointed under s. 3 of the Substitute Decisions Act, was granted full indemnity costs.
Those costs were ordered payable equally by the two siblings personally.