The parties, separated since 2016, brought competing motions for interim relief involving over 20 issues.
The primary issue was the respondent's motion to compel the sale of the jointly owned matrimonial home pursuant to the Partition Act and a prior interim separation agreement.
The applicant opposed the sale, arguing market conditions were poor and a sale would prejudice her family law claims.
The court granted the order for sale, finding the applicant asserted no possessory interest in the home and the respondent had sufficient other assets to satisfy any potential equalization or trust claims.
Both parties' requests for the appointment of a joint expert were dismissed due to unworkable mandates.
The applicant's requests for further disclosure and additional life insurance were also dismissed, as was the respondent's request for a restraining order.
