This divorce proceeding addressed child support, section 7 expenses for a child with special needs, and equalization of net family properties.
The court imputed an annual income of $70,000 to the respondent for child support purposes, finding his reported income inaccurate and his underemployment intentional.
The court also found the applicant's claim for the cost of two caregivers for the child to be a reasonable and necessary section 7 expense, to be shared proportionately.
Regarding property equalization, the court determined that a property in Bangladesh, though titled in the respondent's name, was a gift from his father and thus excluded from his net family property.
The respondent's claim for an unequal division of net family properties, based on alleged pre-separation debt, was dismissed due to insufficient evidence.
The parties were directed to finalize net family property calculations based on the court's findings.
