The appellant appealed his convictions for dangerous driving and criminal harassment, arguing the trial judge failed to provide adequate reasons, misapprehended evidence, and relied on inconsistent testimony from the complainant.
The charges arose from incidents following the separation of the parties, including the appellant cutting off the complainant's vehicle and following her on multiple occasions.
The summary conviction appeal court found that the trial judge's findings were supported by the uncontradicted evidence of the complainant and that the trial judge adequately addressed any minor discrepancies in the testimony.
The appeal was dismissed.
