The Father brought a motion for unsupervised access to his two daughters, whose access had been supervised since June 2014.
The Children's Aid Society (CAS) proposed a discretionary, staged progression, while the Father sought a more rapid, automatic transition to unsupervised visits.
The court noted the Father's recent move, the lack of oversight in his proposal, and past issues with negative communication about the Mother and uncooperative behaviour with CAS staff.
The court adopted a structured, 10-week access progression plan proposed by the Office of the Children's Lawyer (OCL), with specific conditions for missed visits and ongoing oversight.
The court also provided suggestions for subsequent access stages, contingent on CAS approval of the Father's new residence and cohabitant.
