The defendants/plaintiffs by counterclaim brought a motion seeking leave for a non-lawyer to represent a corporation, validation of service of an affidavit of documents, striking statements of defence for alleged irregularities, and sanctions for breach of a prior order.
The court granted leave for the non-lawyer to represent the corporate defendant and validated service of the affidavit of documents.
It dismissed the requests to strike statements of defence and for sanctions, finding that the alleged breaches did not warrant such severe remedies, but ordered one respondent to serve a sworn affidavit of documents.
