The defendants brought a motion to enforce a settlement agreement regarding a property boundary dispute.
The settlement required the parties to hire a licensed surveyor to determine a new boundary line.
The plaintiffs opposed the motion, arguing the surveyor improperly selected a boundary previously determined by the defendants' surveyor.
The court found that the settlement agreement, read objectively, did not preclude the new boundary from matching a previously alleged boundary.
The motion was granted, and the survey was ordered to be registered on title.
