The parties brought motions for summary judgment regarding child support.
The applicant sought to vary a consent final order to cap his child support income due to a significant income increase, arguing against "wealth transfer." The respondent sought to enforce the existing order and collect arrears.
The court found no material change in circumstances to justify varying the order, as the original order already contemplated income fluctuations and provided a mechanism for adjustment.
The applicant's motion to change was dismissed.
The court found the applicant's claimed expenses unreasonable due to lack of documentary proof, adding them back to his income for support calculation.
The respondent's motion to enforce was granted, and the applicant was ordered to pay $219,688.00 in child support arrears.
