The self-represented applicant sought judicial review of a City Council decision granting site plan approval for a condominium development on environmentally sensitive lands near the Thames River.
The applicant attempted to introduce fresh affidavit evidence from experts and herself.
The court admitted portions of the expert evidence commenting on the revised site plan but rejected the applicant's affidavit.
Ultimately, the court dismissed the application, finding that the City Council's decision was not patently unreasonable because the developer's environmental undertakings to the Ontario Municipal Board would be enforced by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.
No costs were awarded.
