Following a successful motion by the receiver to approve the sale of the respondent's assets to the applicant, and the dismissal of a cross-motion by a third party claiming royalty rights, the court determined the costs payable by the third party.
The court rejected the applicant's request for substantial indemnity costs, awarding partial indemnity costs instead.
The court found the applicant's claimed fees reasonable given the importance and complexity of the issues, and ordered the third party to pay $29,705 to the applicant and $3,996.81 to the Monitor.