1 total
Application for catastrophic impairment determination dismissed due to insufficient medical evidence of marked or extreme impairment.
The applicant sought a determination of catastrophic impairment following a 2013 motor vehicle accident, claiming impairments under Criteria 7 and 8 of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.
The Tribunal found that the applicant's medical evidence, primarily from a psychiatrist and a psychologist, was insufficient to establish either a 55% whole person impairment or a marked/extreme impairment in any domain of functioning.
The application was dismissed, and claims for housekeeping benefits, an award, and interest were consequently denied.
No linked lawyers found.
No linked judges found.
