Request for review of drainage compensation decision denied for lack of new evidence or errors.
The requesters sought a review of a Tribunal decision regarding the Holland Marsh Drainage System Canal Improvement Project, arguing that the Tribunal disregarded evidence concerning compensation for their land, immature tree crop, and fill removal, as well as the method for relocating a berm.
The Chair of the Tribunal denied the request for review, finding that the requesters had not brought forward any significant new evidence and that the Tribunal had not made any material errors of law or fact.
The original decision was found to be sound and based on credible expert evidence.
Lawrence and Connie Curtis v. Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury, 2010 ONAFRAAT 40
