The self-represented appellant appealed a trial judgment following a jury verdict, arguing the trial judge erred in several evidentiary rulings, including the exclusion of a video and Building Code extracts, the admission of a psychiatric report, and the redaction of an occupational therapist's report.
She also argued the jury verdict should have been set aside and that transcript errors infringed her right to a bilingual trial.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no errors in the trial judge's discretionary evidentiary rulings, ample evidence to support the jury's verdict, and that the transcript errors did not affect the jury's appreciation of the evidence or deprive the appellant of any grounds of appeal.
