The appellant appealed a decision determining he had no ownership interest in a disputed parcel of land.
The appellant argued the application judge lacked jurisdiction to decide ownership, but the Court of Appeal noted the appellant's own Notice of Application sought a declaration of ownership.
The Court found ample evidence supporting the application judge's decision, as the appellant's title only conveyed part of Lot 4, and the survey he relied upon erroneously included part of Lot 1.
The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent.
