Stiven Hernan Sanchez

The appellant appealed a Small Claims Court decision regarding a claim for unpaid wages for carpentry work and a counterclaim for deficient work.

The trial judge rejected the appellant's evidence on the deficiencies and repair costs because the appellant was not qualified as an expert.

The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that evidence regarding the nature of faulty work and repair valuation requires expert opinion, which the appellant failed to provide.