The parties separated after a seven-and-a-half-year marriage and shared custody of their two children.
The respondent sought retroactive and ongoing child and spousal support, arguing that income should be imputed to the applicant, a medical specialist, due to intentional underemployment and unreasonable corporate expense deductions.
The court imputed income to the applicant based on her full-time earning capacity and adjusted her corporate expenses.
The court dismissed the respondent's claims for retroactive child support and spousal support, but ordered the applicant to pay ongoing child support based on the set-off amount under section 9 of the Child Support Guidelines.
