The Applicant sought costs following a motion for child support, while the Respondent also sought costs.
The court considered the parties' offers to settle, their behaviour, and the Family Law Rules.
The Applicant's offer was less favourable than the final order, and her expectations were deemed unrealistic.
The Respondent's offer was closer to the final order but did not meet formal requirements.
The Respondent was found to have breached a prior divorce order by failing to provide financial disclosure, leading to the Applicant incurring legal costs.
Considering both parties' conduct, the court made no order as to costs.
