Stacey Bergman

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including occupational therapy services, medical services, and attendant care benefits.

The respondent denied the benefits, relying on insurer examinations which concluded the applicant had reached maximum medical improvement and did not require the claimed services.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide corroborating medical evidence from his treating physicians to support the need for the treatment plans or attendant care.

The Tribunal noted significant inconsistencies between the applicant's occupational therapy assessment and his family doctor's clinical notes.

All claims for benefits and interest were dismissed.