1 total
Appeal for lot severance and minor variances dismissed due to insufficient expert planning evidence.
The appellant appealed the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of an application to sever a residential lot into two and for associated minor variances to construct two new detached dwellings.
The Toronto Local Appeal Body dismissed the appeal, finding that the applicant's planning expert failed to provide a substantive analysis of the broader neighbourhood context as required by the Official Plan.
The tribunal concluded that the applicant did not meet the burden of proving that the consent to sever met the criteria under s. 51(24) of the Planning Act, nor that the variances met the four tests under s. 45(1), particularly regarding the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.