The applicant wife sought an order striking the respondent husband's pleadings or compelling disclosure and an expert meeting.
The respondent husband sought to vary a spousal support order and for the sale of the matrimonial home.
The court dismissed the wife's request to strike pleadings and her expert meeting request, but ordered reciprocal questioning with experts present.
The husband's motion to vary spousal support was dismissed, as he failed to demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances or compelling evidence to warrant a variation of the temporary order.
The matrimonial home sale was resolved by consent.
The court declined to award costs to the wife, finding her rejection of expert collaboration unreasonable.