The parties separated after a history of family violence and high conflict.
The mother sought sole decision-making and primary residency of their two children, while the father sought joint decision-making and shared residency.
The older child had refused contact with the father, while the younger child, who has ADHD, continued on a shared schedule.
The court ordered joint decision-making with a parallel parenting tie-breaking mechanism, allocating final authority on specific domains to each parent.
The younger child was ordered to continue on a shared 5-2-2-5 schedule, while the older child was ordered to reside primarily with the mother but transition to alternate weekends with the father following reunification therapy.
