3 total
Applicant designated catastrophically impaired due to traumatic brain injury preventing return to competitive employment.
The applicant was involved in a motorcycle accident and sustained a traumatic brain injury.
He applied for a catastrophic impairment determination under Criterion 4 of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule, relying on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E).
The adjudicator found that the applicant met the threshold for a lower moderate disability, primarily due to his inability to return to work in his previous capacity, and thus qualified for catastrophic impairment status.
The adjudicator also awarded partial attendant care benefits and approved several treatment plans for occupational therapy, psychological services, and a laptop, while denying other claimed medical benefits and a claim for a special award.
Accident benefits denied; applicant failed to prove motor vehicle accident caused subsequent cardiac arrest.
The applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident and suffered a cardiac arrest twelve days later, resulting in severe anoxic brain damage.
He sought various accident benefits, arguing the accident caused increased stress that led to the heart attack.
The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding the applicant failed to meet the 'but for' causation test.
Relying on medical evidence of advanced pre-existing coronary artery disease and the lack of documented stress complaints immediately post-accident, the Tribunal concluded the accident was not a necessary cause of the cardiac arrest.
The applicant's physical injuries were deemed soft-tissue in nature and subject to the Minor Injury Guideline.
Defendant found 30% liable for T-boning disabled vehicle; plaintiff awarded over $3.2 million for brain injury.
The plaintiff suffered a severe traumatic brain injury in a multi-vehicle highway collision.
He lost control of his vehicle after being cut off by an unidentified driver, struck the median, and was subsequently T-boned by the defendant's vehicle.
The court found the unidentified driver 70% liable and the defendant 30% liable for following too closely.
The plaintiff was awarded over $3.2 million in damages, primarily for future care costs.
The plaintiff's claim against his own insurer for unidentified motorist coverage was dismissed because the identified defendant was found partially liable.