2 total
The court imputed income to the self-employed husband for support purposes and ordered equalization, child support, and spousal support.
This decision resolves a family law trial between Tammy Sundberg and Kevin Sundberg, addressing the date of separation, equalization of property, child and spousal support, and related financial issues.
The court determined the date of separation as September 7, 2020, and ordered an equalization payment, child support, and spousal support, with detailed analysis of income imputation, property division, and section 7 expenses.
The court also addressed the costs of a business valuator report and declined to order occupation rent or prejudgment interest.
Motion to add property to non-dissipation order granted; cross-motion to unfreeze accounts dismissed due to non-disclosure.
The applicant brought a motion to add a newly purchased property to an existing non-dissipation order, arguing it was purchased with protected corporate funds.
The respondent brought a cross-motion to unfreeze his accounts and release funds, claiming he needed money for living expenses and corporate taxes.
The court granted the applicant's motion, finding the property was purchased with protected funds.
The court dismissed the respondent's cross-motion, noting his failure to provide court-ordered financial disclosure had delayed the business valuation necessary to determine the equalization payment.