The parties brought cross-motions for interim parenting orders regarding their two youngest children.
The applicant mother sought primary care of the youngest child with conditions on the respondent father's parenting time, citing concerns about his admitted history of sexual addiction and inappropriate behaviour.
The respondent sought equal parenting time on a week-about basis.
The court granted the applicant primary care of the youngest child, finding it consistent with the status quo and the child's best interests.
The court expanded the respondent's parenting time but imposed conditions prohibiting him from keeping pornographic material where the child may be and from discussing his mental health or sexual behaviour with the child.
Parenting time for the older child was ordered to be in accordance with his wishes.
