The parties separated after a high-conflict marriage.
The children resided primarily with the mother and became estranged from the father.
The father sought a 90-day custody reversal to repair the relationship, alleging parental alienation, while the mother sought to relocate with the children to Arizona.
The court found the children were unjustifiably rejecting the father and that the mother had failed to facilitate their relationship.
The court denied the custody reversal but ordered joint custody with a strict access schedule for the father, and denied the mother's mobility application.
The court also resolved financial issues, valuing the father's professional building at $600,000 and ordering him to pay retroactive and ongoing child and spousal support.
